Jed, many people and thousands of scientist have looked the data and they are concluded that scientific data is nowhere near sufficient. It is in best case speculative, suggestive and inconclusive.
There is no 'big money suppression'. That kind of idea is silly and non-informative and it is an argument that turns any reasonable people away from you. Perhaps not in here, but if you are saying that in any other respected forum, such as in wikipedia, you will get banned. It is true, that people often base their argumentation on assumptions and they often cannot separate facts form assumptions. It is difficult and arrogant people do often this kind of naïve categorisation, because they think that they know everything. And if someone presents ideas that are against their prejudices, then they are usually fiercely attacked by ad hominem arguments. Actually you did this also. I did not say anything what I think about cold fusion. But yet, you immediately labelled me as a 'skeptic', although in reality I am a firm believer of cold fusion. It is sad that I need to use the word 'believe', because there are not sufficient and conclusive scientific evidence. It does not help that Miley and Celani does refuse to let other scientists to replicate their quantum reactor although they both claim extremely high reproducibility and power density. If Celani would made just a single demonstration set of his device that is broadcasted in youtube and is supervised by independent respected scientists (in plural), this would be enough to convince every person in the world. There is no need for peer review process that is very easy to abuse, and the idea itself to publish validation results through peer review process is somewhat silly. Youtube is good enough medium, (yes, welcome to the digital age!). The only thing is that any magic tricks should be eliminated. And with Celani's and Miley's ultra high power densities, this is no problem to verify. But both of them, who are self-claimed as scientists, explicitly reject any attempts to replicate their cell. This kind of attitude has nothing to do with science. Science is about openness and sharing information and ideas. —Jouni
