At 10:27 PM 9/15/2012, Kelley Trezise wrote:
So, here is my vote on the matter:
Keep no merge This article has been taken over
by a very small cadre of people opposed to even
the mention of the Energy Catalyzer, Cold
Fusion, LENR, LANR, etc. It is a stain on the
reputation of WP that a small number of very
abusive people can drive off the more moderate
people, rewrite an article in a highly biased
manner and then propose that the article be
deleted. This article as it has been written by
that small clique lies there like an unburried
scat stinking up hell itself. And so it should
remain as a stinky stain on the reputation of
WP. Preceding unsigned comment added by
Zedshort(talk contribs) 01:23, 16 September 2012
Don't waste your time trying to edit the article
as long as the current crew of trolls have
control. It is best that it be left there for
all to see but people need to vote honestly on its reliability and such.
The article was proposed for deletion by a Single
Purpose Account (SPA) who is very likely the sock
puppet of a banned editor. There is revert
warring on the article, seen today. I'm amazed
that TheNextFuture has not only not been blocked,
s/he has not even been warned about revert
warring. Insilvis has also violated the 3RR rule.
TheNextFuture probably knows exactly what s/he is
doing, and doesn't care. Insilvis has no block
history and may not realize that you can be
blocked for 3RR violation for making good reverts, in themselves.
However, there is a 3RR exception for reverting a
banned editor. The guideline suggests not relying
on this.... But nobody has attempted, as far as I
can see, to address the revert warring and blatant sockery.
