At 08:26 PM 9/16/2012, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Jeff Berkowitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> That comment is a bit over my line. I think Abd's position is
appropriate at
> this point in time.
Well, Jeff, I guess my emotions have gotten the better of me. How
long have you been seeking a solution to the world's energy problem?
I apologize to anyone I offend. Then again, don't expect me to change.
As you say. Basically, if you say you can change, you can. And if you
say you cannot change, you cannot.
Usually. Sometimes lightning strikes.
Now, I'm not "seeking a solution to the world's energy problem,"
because I don't see the world as having an energy problem.
We will adapt or we will die. What's the problem?
Rather, my interest is in science and how we understand reality. I'm
not attached to specifics, more than a little.
Right now, I'm looking at some radiation detectors, LR-115, seeing if
I can make any sense out of the tracks. They may have been a little
underdeveloped, but I'm not eager to drop them in the caustic
solution for longer. Underdeveloped could mean crisper images.
If I'm too hot for "energy solutions," my judgment could easily be be
warped. I just want to see what the detectors show, I don't want to
see what I want to see, unless that's what nature intends to show me.
Ultimately, if I find anything of significance here, I'll have
someone else do an analysis, who doesn't know the experimental
conditions to which the detectors were exposed.
