Put on your Tin-foil hats ...

This may or may not be off-topic...  aside from a possible nano-thermite
connection to LENR (as one of the few chemical reactions which release soft
x-rays) but it is timely. It would have been more timely one week ago on
9-11, but nevertheless....

Let me fist add that like many here, I believe that if there was anything
damning about the events leading up to 9-11, it did not involve our
government at the highest elected levels, but it probably did involve our
allies, either officially or unofficially - and possibly one or two rogue
elements in an agency like CIA, who decided to sit on vital information -
instead of issuing an alert. They are probably promoted by now, by the
Dilbert principal.

In recent threads, which touched on the anonymous editing of controversial
Wiki topics, and how easy it is for zealots to impose their own PoV on the
rest of us, we are left to wonder - how did this article below get thru -
unless it contains a large measure of clear truth - on what are very
contentious issues which you will not hear on the nightly News?  I'm
mentioning it in the context of 9-11, and Netanyahu's uninvited visit (guess
who's NOR coming to dinner), but even "sanitized" for Wiki - it's a pretty
strong indictment of a so-called "friend".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks_advance-knowledge_conspira
cy_theories

Back to recent vortex threads - one would want to ask, since LENR gets poor
treatment on Wiki despite the preponderance of experimental science on our
side, how do you squeeze-in an article which at first seems to be pandering
to conspiracy buffs? If it has a large measure of truth, as it must - where
is CNN and 60 Minutes? Why do they not expose this interloper Netanyahu as
the instigator that he was then, and still is? 

Yes, he probably had a role in 9-11 and he came back on the anniversary to
try to steer our political system into attacks against Iran. He should be
persona non grata! BTW - the tenor of the article, especially the insider
trading issues - which have been swept under the rug by the SEC - give
credence to advance knowledge by Israeli financial interests. Was Netanyahu
one of those who benefited via put options?

The reason this came up all this anniversary of the tragedy - is that a few
Canadians have been pushing their government to uncover a claimed Mossad
connection to 911 - since quite a few Canadians perished in the incident.
They do not want to be written off as "collateral damages" to a foreign
effort aimed at forcing the USA into one war which we are still not out of
yet.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltkd9mVO-70

... since the announcer had said point blank that "5 Israeli agents had been
arrested and released" without charges, that raised eyebrows among some -
"is he deluded?" but it takes only a few minutes to find this story online:

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/5-israelis-detained-for-puzzling-b
ehavior-after-wtc-tragedy-1.70005

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html

The Haaretz story is from a source that makes it seem trustworthy and a bit
understated. The reported agents who were arrested on 9/11 is basically
true, begging the questions of their connections to Mossad, which turned up
elsewhere - but most importantly - why was this not investigated further by
the 9-11 Commission? And why not the stock options bought by Israelis?

Well, that part of the history is more understandable, since the commission
report reeks of cover up from start to finish, 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFrW3j6e9AA

... and Steven Jones' findings are another issue - related to what the 5
agents delivered that morning to the WTC. BTW - Dr Jones, when at Brigham
Young U. was a nemesis of Pons & Fleishmann back then in 1989, but
ironically, he found copious evidence of nano-thermite at the 9-11 site. And
were it not for his own association with LENR, he would have been taken more
seriously.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_E._Jones

Oh what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practice to deceive!  

Jones



<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to