What is your basis for concluding that this is a "conservative" think tank? or is it just another one of your baseless "opinions". The article appears to be a moderate piece written from the perspective of a skeptic of Rossi's shinanigans. A sentiment many of us here reflect. I do not see any "conservative" bias at all. In fact, I find his "Jesus" comment quite offensive.
I resent the implication that you and Jed and other liberals in this forum always make. You take swipes at conservatives as if conservatives are the reason for all the ills of this world. I resent your implication that conservatives do not believe in science or do science. Well, I am a conservative, I believe in the existence of the Almighty Creator God. And I do science - to figure out the mind of God. And I do cold fusion research, and I have a "Science" degree. Much more than what you can say. 'Nuff said. Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: Daniel Rocha To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 1:27 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR article at Casey Research That seems to be a conservative think tank or something of the sort. I guess this kind of assessment towards alternative energy is not unexpected. 2012/9/19 Joe Hughes <[email protected]> I usually really enjoy reading the articles on the Casey Research site, although the latest article from their "Chief Energy Investment Strategist" is a total hit piece IMHO. Really burns me up - I think I'm going to have to send her an email in response to it. http://www.caseyresearch.com/cdd/do-fringes-energy-science-offer-real-hope-energy-hungry-world Excerpt: "Cold fusion is many things – including a mental exercise for theoretical physicists and a hoax from Andrea Rossi – but legitimate is not one of them" Anyone have any thoughts on what information to use to best discount her claims? Joe -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
