"If claim of Rossi are right, the power density per gram of powder is awesome 596.85 W/g ( (14337-2400)/20 )"
This is correct. I neglected to subtract out the input power. Craig On 10/12/2012 01:21 PM, Craig Haynie wrote: > If average power over 228 hours is 14.337 KW, and the total charge is 20 > g, then shouldn't the power density be: > > 14337 / 20 = 716 watts/gm = 716 kw / kg > > Craig > > On 10/12/2012 01:15 PM, Arnaud Kodeck wrote: >> Why Rossi is taking energy produced per weight as a power density ? In the >> report he says : >> >> "POWER DENSITY >> >> 163,4 MW*kg^-1 (onehundred sixtythree point four MWh >> per kg) >> (see the Ragone Plot at pag. 15 of the Penon Report >> attached)" >> >> He should have called that the energy density which has no meaning here >> cause there are still energy to release of its cylinder ... >> >> It seems, he is always confusing energy and power. With its kWh/h unity >> which for means nothing physical. >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Arnaud Kodeck [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: vendredi 12 octobre 2012 19:06 >>> To: '[email protected]' >>> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Hot Cat COP 11.7 >>> >>> If claim of Rossi are right, the power density per gram of >>> powder is awesome 596.85 W/g ( (14337-2400)/20 ) >>> >>> Celani's wire is around ~70 W/g >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: vendredi 12 octobre 2012 18:37 >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [Vo]:Hot Cat COP 11.7 >>>> >>>> http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/10/leonardo-corp-releases-new-h >>>> ot-cat-report/ >>>>
