Jim,

Just trying to get my grade up at the unaccredited Bowery U, I have placed
an explanation on my blog on how a massive collapsed matter particle from a
CME can achieve and maintain orbit through and around the Earth.  If you
have 5 minutes it is on my blog

Stewart
darkmattersalot.com





On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:30 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote:

> The other thing to note is the particle is in a decaying Earth orbit, not
> your silly ass Wolfram 1st grade example.
>
>
> On Monday, November 19, 2012, James Bowery wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry, that answer is only a little better than "Its in the library
>> somewhere."
>>
>> You get an F.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:53 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>> Read my blog
>>
>>
>> On Monday, November 19, 2012, James Bowery wrote:
>>
>> Pop quiz!
>>
>> Kepler is famous for having solved calculus derivation of minima and
>> maxima of a curve when presented with the challenge of finding the optimum
>> shape for a barrel of dill pickles to go with the tasty char broiled
>> hamburgers that history now recognizes as the inspiration for flavour in
>> physics.
>>
>> Kepler is also famous for having found the closed form solution to the
>> two body orbital problem where the mass and velocities of two co-orbiting
>> bodies is known.
>>
>> Given the mass of the earth and the purported orbital speed of the
>> gremlin of thousands of kilometers per second, what is the minimum mass of
>> a gremlin that can result in a maximal orbital velocity of just 1000
>> kilometers per second?
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:36 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>> Notice Woflram does not show you the particle mass.  Orbits depend on
>> more than just velocity.  Also notice that the research does not place a
>> lower limit on mass:
>>
>> "If the WIMP is heavy even with optimistic assumptions and large exposures
>> it will only be possible to place a lower limit on its mass"
>>
>> Also notice that two body Kepler orbits do not necessarily orbit around
>> the center of mass of either object they orbit a barycenter, which may
>> place their orbit above and below the surface of matter that they weakly
>> interact with.
>>
>> Also notice that if a good portion of your orbit is through a mass that
>> you interact gravitationally with it will attempt to lock you in as opposed
>> to an orbiting satellite in space.  Just like the moving ocean mass will
>> attempt to steer you gravitationally.
>>
>> Also notice that your hamburger just disappeared thru beta decay while
>> you were not watching and listening to me.
>>
>> Stewart
>> darkmattersalot.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:21 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> My, Goodness!
>>
>> You'd better get over there to Wolfram's model of WIMP Orbiting Inside
>> Earth
>>
>> http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/WIMPOrbitingInsideEarth/
>>
>> And tell them to fix their units labeling.  If one were a hamburger
>> helper physicist, one might be led to believe that the speed unit was m/s
>> rather than km/s!
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:09 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>> Stick to cooking hamburgers.  You make much more sense in your field of
>> knowledge
>>
>> local WIMP speed distribution is known (Maxwellian with vc=220 km/s)
>> http://conferences.fnal.gov/dmwksp/Talks/AGreen.pdf
>>
>> fits great with my orbital model speed and mass of a massive collapsed
>> particle
>>
>> I have supplied plenty of predictions as to location and detection for
>> you/others to prove me wrong. I have also supplied plenty of observations
>> that fit.  I suggest you camp out near an actively growing sinkhole and
>> cook your hamburgers on your beta decay grill.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:42 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>> iYes, of course!  The weak interaction, which essentially disappears at a
>> distance of around 10^-17m, provides many orders of magnitude greater force
>> than does gravitation at scales of 10^3m.  This is why a gremlin travelling
>> at speeds orders of magnitude above escape
>>
>>

Reply via email to