Dear Jones,

a very interesting idea re nickel minnes and isotopic anomalies.Recently I
have translated an well written paper about Oklo- about Paul Kuroda
the nuclear chemist who has predicted Oklo.
Let's hope that Defkailon will offer us a kind of isotopic symphony when
the will work full steam at Vancouver.This will be an essential
contribution to understanding how useful CF works..
Peter

On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Peter,****
>
> ** **
>
> There is a provocative analogy of LENR to fission (in the context of the
> Oklo natural fission site):****
>
> ** **
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_nuclear_fission_reactor****
>
> ** **
>
> But it is non-obvious, and yet it suggests that there could indeed be a
> “natural LENR” on Earth. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Don’t laugh – I am completely serious. Perhaps you were a bit too timid to
> go there J****
>
> ** **
>
> If you take the metaphor of Oklo even further, the place on earth where
> one would look for a similar anomaly is nickel mines. What would one look
> for? That part is simple: isotope anomalies. ****
>
> ** **
>
> This assumes that nickel LENR is a novel reaction with hydrogen that
> results in isotopic changes. There are other possibilities to look for –
> but for now, let’s stick with this one.****
>
> ** **
>
> As fate would have it – in doing a cursory search (Bing, instead of
> Google, nowadays) it turns out that the nickel in most meteorites is
> “neutron-poor” isotopically compared to natural nickel on earth. However,
> nickel mines on earth usually have, as their source of rich ore – large and
> ancient meteorite  impact sites. Sudbury in Ontario is a case in point. Yet
> the nickel there is NOT neutron poor.****
>
> ** **
>
> The authors in the paper below make an assumption the earth’s nickel is
> the baseline standard for isotope distribution. However, if we start from a
> different premise and assume that millions of years ago, earthly nickel
> began to slowly change isotopically, due to hydrogen interaction ala LENR
> then you come to a surprising conclusion. BTW - hydrogen can come from
> either H2O seepage in mines or from the solar wind. ****
>
> ** **
>
> http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2012/pdf/2354.pdf****
>
> ** **
>
> Could earthly nickel have changed slight over the millennia … and
> meteorites we find from later date actually be the correct baseline? Maybe,
> but not an ounce of proof for that contention so far – however, the
> possibility cannot be ignored. That specific scenario for heavier nickel
> would be that over time, the neutron rich isotopes are transmuted via
> “virtual neutrons” on earth, but in a novel reaction that does not change
> the z (to copper, although some of the time it does).****
>
> ** **
>
> Virtual neutrons, in this case, are the result of fractional hydrogen f/H
> – which is hydrogen going into a deeply redundant ground state where it
> becomes “energy poor” and then finally is adsorbed as a virtual neutron,
> not a proton (as in W-L). An example would be 60Ni -> 61Ni but in the sense
> of a novel reaction, which goes no further. No subsequent beta decay.****
>
> ** **
>
> Of course, the bulk of neutron changes which we know about do involve a
> later beta decay, but in this case, the f/H probably arrives from the solar
> wind where it is already “energy-depleted” having given up EUV energy in
> the solar corona in the way that Randell Mills has suggested.****
>
> ** **
>
> Jones****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Peter Gluck ****
>
> ** **
>
> "Is cold fusion natural?****
>
>
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2012/12/is-cold-fusion-natural-essay-in.html
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Actually who will care when it will be a genuine energy ****
>
> source? Natural is very popular, cold fusion is only for us****
>
> but perhaps the question(s) will do some good for solving some****
>
> problems.****
>
> Peter****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> Dr. Peter Gluck****
>
> Cluj, Romania****
>
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com****
>
> ** **
>



-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to