It should be noted that the fire fighters association merely demand that proof 
of no harm be submitted before they allow towers to be co located to their 
facilities.  This is not the same as having proof that they are a hazard.  The 
same logic could be used to eliminate street lighting at night or prevent AC 
power from being sent to homes and for other uses.  No one has proved that 
these are not harmful since it is supposed to be dark at night, and the 
electromagnetic fields associated with power transmission are far stronger than 
the RF reaching people at ground level.


Of course cars should be banned because they clearly are dangerous to people.  
The list goes on and on as we assume various risks to living.


You should realize that if the same criteria is applied to LENR, it will never 
be allowed in public places.  Who would be capable of guaranteeing that it is 
totally impossible for harm to come from the use of these devices?  We need to 
have rules that are based upon good common sense and the best current science, 
not emotion.


Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: pagnucco <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, Dec 10, 2012 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Those EMP weapons (and your cellphone) could actually be  
doing more personal harm than previously thought


Adrian,

Your concern is shared.
Notice that fire fighters resist cell tower placement on fire stations -

PACTS - Firefighters BAN cell towers on fire stations
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FokZLeh6ILg


    INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS
DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, SAFETY AND MEDICINE

Position on the Health Effects from Radio Frequency/Microwave (RF/MW)
Radiation in Fire Department Facilities from Base Stations for Antennas
and Towers for the Conduction of Cell Phone Transmissions

The International Association of Fire FightersÂ’ position on locating cell
towers commercial wireless infrastructure on fire department facilities,
as adopted by its membership in August 2004 (1), is that the IAFF oppose
the use of fire stations as base stations for towers and/or antennas for
the conduction of cell phone transmissions until a study with the highest
scientific merit and integrity on health effects of exposure to
low-intensity RF/MW radiation is conducted and it is proven that such
sitings are not hazardous to the health of our members.

http://www.iaff.org/hs/Facts/CellTowerFinal.asp


Some years ago, I was in a biological physics lab where the experimenter
pointed out effects on plant growth of low-to-high frequency em/rf
radiation.  However, he stated that companies who would be adversely
affected by restrictions on em-radiation keep scientists on retainer who
quickly issue rebuttals to any study that raises public concern.

-- Lou Pagnucco


>
> I see it's hard to draw a response from the vortex crowd if you're not a
> long time list member. Well, I've been lurking for 2 years now, diligently
> reading what all the open minds here have to say, so I know I'm not the
> first first-time poster to be ignored. I don't feel offended by this since
> I think it's a reasonable reaction to interact mostly with those who have
> already established some kind of presence here. Additionally, or maybe
> primarily, the possible reason for silence was the lack of a compelling
> argument in my post as to why someone would want to spend/kill some time
> watching one video over so many others waiting to be seen.
>
> But dammit, Mark Goldes, who's been around for a while also referenced
> this video (similarly without response) in the recent Butterflies thread.
>
>
> Really, though - the movie makes a strong case for electromagnetic fields
> interfering with the basic process of life. I pretty much guarantee that
> you haven't heard the argument put forth towards the end of the movie as
> to why "we should care". It would be good to see some conversation come
> out of this - either to call BS or to back up the claims. It's funny
> though, one of the points made in the video is that it's typically the
> "engineer" types (typical vortex member?) who are called upon to give
> their opinion on the effects of the man-made electromagnetic spectrum the
> use of which has grown exponentially over the last 50 years. According to
> the movie, these types generally don't give much thought to the biological
> impact in their work.
>
>
> -- Adrian
>
>
> Hmm, maybe it was just because I didn't make the link click-able. Here it
> is then:
> Resonance - Beings of Frequency
> http://vimeo.com/54189727
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Adrian Sampaleanu <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 11:46 AM
> Subject: [Vo]:Those EMP weapons (and your cellphone) could actually be
> doing more personal harm than previously thought
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> This didn't get through on my first attempt. It does look kind of
> spam-ish, I guess, but it was triggered by the other thread on EMP
> missiles.
>



 

Reply via email to