No one has ever proved that cellular phones cause cancer. There have been many tests over the years as lawyers seek fertile ground. On rare occasions a statistical search tends to point in the direction of harm, but all of these that I am aware of have big flaws.
We live in a dangerous world and it is impossible to avoid all potential dangers. How many lives could be saved by eliminating cars? Of course, all weapons are made to cause harm and many lives would be saved if they were all taken out of circulation. Are we ready to give up radio communications to possibly save a few lives a year? There are many more lives saved by the quick response allowed by their usage and, can you imagine how upset your children would become if someone banned texting and all other radio applications? Dave -----Original Message----- From: Mark Goldes <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Dec 10, 2012 4:41 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:Your cellphone could actually be doing more personal harm than previously thought Vo, In case I did not post this earlier... “You pick up the phone once, twice, ten times a day – or only a few times a month. But, each and every time, you’re gambling that this time won’t be the occasion when the radiation causes irreparable damage to your brain. It only takes a seemingly small trauma at a very small location to result in tissue damage, DNA damage, or chromosome mutation.” Cover quote from CELLULAR TELEPHONE RUSSIAN ROULETTE, a book by the late Robert C. Kane. You can download it free: http://www.scribd.com/doc/21783803/Cellular-Telephone-Russian-Roulette Mark Mark Goldes Co-Founder, Chava Energy CEO, Aesop Institute www.chavaenergy.com www.aesopinstitute.org 707 861-9070 707 497-3551 fax ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 1:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Those EMP weapons (and your cellphone) could actually be doing more personal harm than previously thought Adrian, Your concern is shared. Notice that fire fighters resist cell tower placement on fire stations - PACTS - Firefighters BAN cell towers on fire stations http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FokZLeh6ILg > > I see it's hard to draw a response from the vortex crowd if you're not a > long time list member. Well, I've been lurking for 2 years now, diligently > reading what all the open minds here have to say, so I know I'm not the > first first-time poster to be ignored. I don't feel offended by this since > I think it's a reasonable reaction to interact mostly with those who have > already established some kind of presence here. Additionally, or maybe > primarily, the possible reason for silence was the lack of a compelling > argument in my post as to why someone would want to spend/kill some time > watching one video over so many others waiting to be seen. > > But dammit, Mark Goldes, who's been around for a while also referenced > this video (similarly without response) in the recent Butterflies thread. > > > Really, though - the movie makes a strong case for electromagnetic fields > interfering with the basic process of life. I pretty much guarantee that > you haven't heard the argument put forth towards the end of the movie as > to why "we should care". It would be good to see some conversation come > out of this - either to call BS or to back up the claims. It's funny > though, one of the points made in the video is that it's typically the > "engineer" types (typical vortex member?) who are called upon to give > their opinion on the effects of the man-made electromagnetic spectrum the > use of which has grown exponentially over the last 50 years. According to > the movie, these types generally don't give much thought to the biological > impact in their work. > > > -- Adrian > > > Hmm, maybe it was just because I didn't make the link click-able. Here it > is then: > Resonance - Beings of Frequency > http://vimeo.com/54189727 > > > > ________________________________ > From: Adrian Sampaleanu <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 11:46 AM > Subject: [Vo]:Those EMP weapons (and your cellphone) could actually be > doing more personal harm than previously thought > > > Hi all, > > This didn't get through on my first attempt. It does look kind of > spam-ish, I guess, but it was triggered by the other thread on EMP > missiles. >
