A self sustained system will insure that the excess heat effect is real. That means put 12m of Celani's wire inside the cell (4W *12 = 48 equal to input power). But the system will become very unstable. The 4W is an average calculated so far from results today. As Rossi claims to do, a buffer of input power must be kept.
Increasing the ratio output / input will insure us of the excess heat. > -----Original Message----- > From: Akira Shirakawa [mailto:shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com] > Sent: mercredi 12 décembre 2012 23:06 > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Direct heating of Celani's wire at EU cell of MFMP > > On 2012-12-12 22:57, Arnaud Kodeck wrote: > > I would be a little more conservative. The excess power must be kept for > > more than an hour or two, to at least remove any chemical reaction that > may > > occur. > > > > As shown now, the excess power has decreased just above 4W. That excess > heat > > might not stay long. Cross finger that it will happen. > > You're right. More time is needed to rule out chemical reactions, for > the current run. > > Before applying power directly to the active wire, they heated the cell > with the reference (inert) wire for several hours continuously, and it > still appeared to show significant amounts (a few watts) of excess heat > however, so I think that chemical sources can already be ruled out. > > The real question, as I previously mentioned, probably is if this excess > heat effect is actually real or not. > > Cheers, > S.A.
