I proposed a simple test procedure for the MFMP team at the EU site to conduct. 
 


First, they need to let the cell cool down to around room temperature.  Then, 
the 48 watt step drive function should be applied to the inactive wire for 1 
hour. 


After that period has elapsed, the drive needs to be rapidly switched to the 
active wire for the next 1 hour period.


Next, the drive should be reapplied to the inactive wire as quickly as possible 
and allowed to continue for the next 1 hour period.


My reasoning is as follows:  First, any ambient wave effects should be visible 
during the entire period if they are a result of HVAC or air currents.  It is 
unlikely that the center time frame will be treated differently to external 
forces.  Second, I have an excellent curve fitting routine that follows the 
time domain responses for the power input steps and it is suggesting strongly 
that there appears to be excess power during the time that the outer glass 
temperature exceeds 100 C when drive is applied to the active wire.  Below that 
temperature, the fit is consistent.


It seems logical that the drive power, if it reaches the outer glass surface, 
will behave the same to a large extent regardless of which wire is driven.  
When the drive is applied to the inactive wire, the actual temperature of the 
active wire will be much lower than when the drive is switched.  This state 
should correspond to the region where my curve fit routine matches the 
measurements well since little excess power appears to be generated at the 
lower active wire temperature.


With the data, I should be able to generate a rock solid curve fit for the 
first hour that will allow comparisons against the second hour during the 
active wire drive.  The third hour should then fall onto the curve fit as 
continued from the first hour.


If the outer glass temperature indeed shows the 2.5 C rise that I suspect, then 
I will be fairly confident that excess power is generated.  The only hole in 
the hypothesis is if the true outer glass temperature depends upon which wire 
is driven due to some strange geometry.


Earlier testing tended to suggest that there was little if any excess heat 
being generated.  There appeared to be periods of time during which energy was 
absorbed followed by release of roughly the same amount of excess energy.  This 
needs to be followed up upon since something strange is suggested to be 
occurring.


I think it is important to understand the breathing response and see if it is 
correlated with some process.  It will be most interesting if the breathing 
only happens when the active wire is driven!


The MFMP team has done a great job with their testing and we should support 
them at every opportunity.


Dave





 

Reply via email to