On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Craig <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, when I compare the actual values of the running cell #2 with this > calibration template, I can see that T_GlassIn is roughly the same, but > both T_GlassOut and T_Mica are higher in the live test. > > Calibration Run from Frame 15 in the link. > > https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9qCtGOFmvhmWXUxWGRxYXFmMzg/edit?pli=1 > > Power (Red) =~ 53.4 > T Glass In =~ 130.5 > T Glass Out =~ 110.0 > T Ambient =~ 18.8 > T Mica =~ 172.9 > > Live Run > > Power (Red) =~ 54.0 > T Glass In =~ 130.8 > T Glass Out =~ 119.3 > T Ambient =~ 20.6 > T Mica =~ 193.5 > > So, wouldn't the fact that the temperature of the core is significantly > hotter also be an indication that they are actually seeing excess heat? > (isn't that T Mica)
Personally, I would say yes. However, it is not conclusive because the data has some of the characteristics of an artifact as well. >This makes T Glass In look suspicious, rather than > the T Glass Out measurement. > > Craig > Harry
