Ransom, it makes sense when you consider that there is more money in oil
than the survival of the earth and humanity.

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Randy wuller <[email protected]> wrote:

> **
> Jojo:
>
> I don't understand your passionate position on this issue.  Given some
> evidence either way, the only logical position is one of caution.  If there
> is a possibility mankind can change the climate on this planet, it seems to
> me we should take some care to avoid that alternative unless there is no
> doubt about what our meddling will change and it is harmless.
> It is the conservative thing to do, yet, it seems most conservatives feel
> differently.  It is a puzzle to me.
>
> Ransom
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Jojo Jaro <[email protected]>
> *To:* Vortex-l <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, December 17, 2012 1:22 PM
> *Subject:* [Vo]:New Data "Worrying" 2000 climatologists about Global
> Warming ....
>
> Here's some new data that is "worrying" 2000 climatologists about Global
> Warming ....
>
> Obviously, since 2000 of them were right, this new data must be wrong.
>
> This first link shows the rate of ice melting leading to the conclusion
> that Global Warming must be accelerating....???
>
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/28/sea_levels_new_science_climate_change/
>
>
> Then, to confirm it, this 2nd link "definitely" shows that Global warming
> is occuring that is "correlated" to the amount of C02 that man pumps out
> into the atmosphere.... ????
>
>
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/29/wmo_global_temp_figures_2012_doha_ninth_hottest/
>
>
> But, what do I know.  I'm not one of those 2000 climatologists who where
> NOT bribed or threatened in any way.  And since, there's 2000 of them;
> there's only one of me.  They must be right and I am wrong and anybody
> questioning their conclusions must be nuts.  Right Jed?
>
>
>  Hey, if others can violate forum list rules with impunity regarding AGW
> propaganda, I should be able to do the opposite propaganda with impunity...
> right?
>
>
>
>
> Jojo
>
>
> PS:  BTW, I want nothing more than people laying off AGW (or Anti-AGW)
> propaganda from this forum.
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2637/5466 - Release Date: 12/17/12
>
>

Reply via email to