In the report, STM doesn't say where the neutron and gamma are measured. If neutron and/or gamma have low energy, they might be absorbed by the vessel before reaching the detector. Outside the reactor is not the best place for the detector.
Regarding the input power versus temperature, it's clear that the reactor has small size. It would be difficult to include also the detector inside the reactor as well. But without pictures or drawings, this is just thoughts and assumptions. Arnaud > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: mercredi 19 décembre 2012 22:34 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Vo]:STMicroelectronics report on their version of the Celani > apparatus > > In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:43:39 -0500: > Hi, > [snip] > >STMicroelectronics report on their version of the Celani apparatus: > > > >http://www.22passi.it/coherence2012/coherence%2014%20dicembre%202012%20Ce > lani%20wire.pdf > > > >On page 2 it says over a couple of charts: > >"Neutron and gamma continuous recording in ST > >lab. No difference for spectra during experiments > >showing extra heat and background" > > > >Does this mean they did not detect any anomalous gamma or neutrons > emissions? > >If so then it is more evidence that the Celani doesn't produce excess > heat. > > > >Harry > > It's still possible that any putative excess heat is either non nuclear, > or a > form of nuclear that doesn't produce gammas and doesn't rely on neutrons. > (e.g. Takahashi). > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
