The November 10 explosion in Indianapolis has resulted in criminal charges
for arson. See:

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local/indiana&id=8928285

QUOTE

December 21, 2012 ( INDIANAPOLIS) -- A homeowner, her boyfriend and the
boyfriend's brother were charged Friday with murder and arson in a massive
explosion that killed two people, destroyed five homes and damaged dozens
more in an Indianapolis neighborhood. . . .

Investigators determined that Shirley's home - at the epicenter of the
devastating blast that killed her neighbors, John Dion Longworth, 34, and
his 36-year-old wife Jennifer Longworth - filled up with gas after a gas
fireplace valve and a gas line regulator were removed, Curry said. A
microwave, probably set to start on a timer, sparked the explosion and
flattened much of the Richmond Hills subdivision in the far south of the
city, he said. . . .

A man fitting Bob Leonard's description was seen at Shirley's home on the
day of the explosion, and investigators believe this is when the gas line
and valve were tampered with. . . ."

UNQUOTE

This illustrates the fact that conventional energy systems are inherently
dangerous. They seldom cause damage or death because they are tightly
controlled, monitored, and regulated. Only licensed people are allowed to
work with them. In the 19th century, in the decades after natural gas
distribution began, and electric power distribution began, there were many
accidents. People learned from experience. The technology improved, but it
was almost as important that people generally become more experienced and
adept using these new energy sources. People at home learned to fear the
smell of leaking gas, and they learned you must never let an electric
appliance touch water.

We worry about the dangers and unknowns of cold fusion. We should worry
about that. But we should bear in mind that the dangers of conventional
energy are only held at bay by constant effort and at great expense. And by
society-wide experience -- which is an interesting thing. We do not sense
it because it is all around us. After WWII, when vacuum cleaners and other
machines were introduced into Japan by the Occupation, Uncle Sam published
a book in Japanese for the young women working as maids and staff telling
them things like, "never try to vacuum up spilled liquids. Do not wash this
vacuum cleaner in water, or put it in a bucket of water; you might
electrocute yourself." They had to be told what everyone now learns from
childhood.

We know as much about how to keep safe with gas and electricity as our
grandparents knew how to deal with kerosene lamps and coal and wood burning
stoves. Kerosene lamps can be dangerous, by the way. Sometime around 1925
my grandfather walked into a house and saw one on a table which had burned
low. That is to say, the level of liquid kerosene had fallen, the cloth
wick was no longer uptaking the fluid, and the fire was starting to burn
down the wick toward the remaining fluid at the bottom of the bowl. When
that happens, the lamp explodes. My grandfather picked up the lamp, ran
through the room, and threw the lamp straight through a closed window,
shattering the glass, into the back yard.

A modern person would probably have no idea what he was seeing when the
flame starts moving down the wick. He would not react in time. Plus you
can't throw an object through a modern window. This is why I do not
recommend inexperienced people use obsolete technology. To heck with
nostalgia -- you will blow yourself up!

In the PBS documentary "1900 House" they set up a kitchen, bathrooms and
other living arrangements that were not so different from those I grew up
with, and were actually well ahead of those my wife grew up with in rural
Japan. In the 1900 House they had a coal fire stove in the kitchen with
some kind of barrier around it, and screens, to prevent people from burning
themselves. One of the people cooking on it burned herself despite this. I
looked at it and thought to myself, "we didn't have any barriers around
those things when I was a kid." I don't recall ever burning myself on one
but I must have come close on many occasions. Honestly, until I saw that
documentary, it never occurred to me that having a large iron stove in the
middle of the room with burning wood in it might be considered dangerous.
Lots of people had those things in the 1950s and 60s, and we took it in
stride. We also kept a 22 cal. rifle on a shelf in the foyer. I don't
recall where the ammo was, but it wasn't locked up. We did that just
because people did that sort of thing in those days. Not for fear of crime
or anything. I used to shoot it on weekends, in Pennsylvania, for the heck
of it. We thought nothing of it. The WWII generation was used to firearms.

Society-wide experience may also explain why automobile accident rates per
passenger mile seem to decline year by year even when safety standards do
not change. General knowledge of how to avoid accidents seems to be
spreading through society, three or four generations after cars came into
widespread use in the 1920s. Experience is taught deliberately or by
example from one generation to the next. My mother was the first in our
family to drive a car, in the 1920s. My mother was crazy about cars. She
drove, cars, army trucks, tractors and "anything with wheels" during
WWII. She took many risks that I would not take. She thought nothing of
driving without a seatbelt because seat belts did not exist. She said
"unless you grew up in a world without cars, you will never understand how
liberating they were." I feel the same way about computers. I am a much
more cautious driver -- or just plain timid. My children do not own cars.
They borrow a Zipcar when they have to. Driving has gone from being a
pleasure, to an unpleasant chore, to an occasional nuisance. Driving is no
longer considered a coming-of-age ritual.

When cold fusion begins -- if it begins -- we will not have society-wide
experience with it. We will not be able to depend on people who learned
from childhood how to use it safely. We will have to build many more
safeguards into the machines than we did with the first gas and electric
systems, and the first automobiles. We will have to start off with a more
idiot-proof technology, because society will not longer tolerate a learning
curve lasting decades. It is reasonable that society demands this.

- Jed

Reply via email to