While I think banning one or 2 might be a good idea. Since Bill has shown a reluctance to do this maybe setting up a filter is the best way.
I would rather have a list owner that allowed freedom over a dictator that micromanaged it. Maybe those who have actually contributed to the running cost would have a case to request such though? I never have. John On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: > > The avatar I believe you are referring to has also been banned from > commenting on our website due to the exact same activity that has nothing > to do with our focus of cold fusion. > > It is quite offensive and I believe the entity has a mental illness, so > engaging it will do no good. > > > > On 12/22/12 9:21 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > > Here, after a long period simply ignoring this fellow's posts, when it > became clear that he was using this list almost totally to troll, I started > responding again, initially by documenting what he'd been doing, showing > how he was lying about his own behavior. > > > > -- > Ruby Carat > [email protected] > Skype ruby-carat > www.coldfusionnow.org > >
