My friends, you will notice who it is that wanted to keep this topic alive.

The facts make it clear in case the Vortex system does not.  Lomax started
this thread for which I responded with the truth.  Orgasm Wikipedia
responded by agreeing and everything he said is the truth.  As documented in
the news.

Now Lomax, panicking that people will see the truth about islam is spinning
again and insulting people for telling the truth. He claims that Ahmadinejad
is expressing a personal opinion.  Lomax must really have such a low opinion
of Vorticians that he would even attempt such a low and obviously moronic
spin.  Does anyone really buy this spin that Ahmy is not expressing official
policy.  Oh, that's right, he is standing in front of the United Nations,
speaking on behalf of his country and he is simply expressing "personal"
opinion?  I wonder which drug Lomax is on cause that sure is a very potent
hallucinogen.  I might need some after reading all this verbal diarrhea from
Lomax.

Lomax would like us to believe that islam is not a threat to our freedom and
way of life.  But history and recent events tell a different story.  Islam
will conquer the world and rule it thru deception or thru force if
necessary.  That my friends is the truth.

Note that he calls Israel the aggressor for preparing against a first
strike.  OK, Let's see, if a gang of criminals is pointing a loaded gun at
you and is telling you openly that he is going to shoot you, do you wait
until he does before taking action.  Lomax would like us to believe that
taking action against an official policy of a mad man in a mad country ruled
by mad religious clerics is inappropriate.  Good thing, there are still some
of our leaders who do not live in the same twilight zone as Lomax.



Jojo


PS. BTW, Here are some references from muslims scholars and books that document the marriage of muhammed to a 6 year-old little girl barely out of diapers and still playing with dolls. Muhammend consumated the marriage when she was 9 years old as I have been saying all along. Remember this well and get this thru your thick heads, this truth is taken from muslim sources, not "evangelical" sources as Lomax would like you to believe. Just look up these muslim books to confirm what is written here. Just Do IT. You have no right to call me a liar or say I am deluded and misinformed until you look this up.

Now, I wonder who is telling the truth.

But, I'm pretty sure Lomax will spin this again and say that A'isha was just a servant or something moronic like that.


OK, your turn Lomax.






Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3311:
'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and he was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 236:

Narrated Hisham's father:
Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.

Here is how the Prophet used to have fun and sex with his child bride.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 6, Number 298:

Narrated 'Aisha:

The Prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were Junub. During the menses, he used to order me to put on an Izar (dress worn below the waist) and used to fondle me. While in Itikaf, he used to bring his head near me and I would wash it while I used to be in my periods (menses).



Sahih Muslim Book 3, Number 0629:

'A'isha reported: I and the Messenger (may peace be upon him) took a bath from the same vessel and our hands alternated into it in the state that we had had sexual intercourse.

Can we ever imagine how an over fifty years old man could fondle his pre-teen wife during her menstrual cycle! By the way, the meaning of Junub is sexual defilement, that is, the state after having sex.







----- Original Message ----- From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 1:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives, and marriageable age


At 06:26 AM 12/22/2012, orgasm wikipedia wrote:

I STILL AGREE!

See bottom of this comment.

<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=from:%22Jojo+Jaro%22>Jojo Jaro <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=date:20121220>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:52:43 -0800

[follows Jojo Jaro's rant.]
Lomax reminds me of Ahmadinejad.

One of the characteristics of paranoia is that
one thing "reminds" the paranoid of something
else, with great ease, what are seen by most
people as disconnected facts, with no common
causal relationship, are interpreted as
interconnecting proofs of the underlying thesis.

  Ahmadinejad's religious beliefs in the imminent
return of the "occulted" Shi'a Imam Muhammad
al-Mahdi have alarmed some Western commentators.

Ahmadinejad expresses a personal experience,
where he interprets attention from world leaders
as having some kind of mystical cause. He may not
be incorrect about that, but from my own
training, he may be adding interpretation to the
experience that is, shall we say, personal,
related to his belief system and world-view.

How I'd be related to this person is beyond me,
beyond what he's doing here: relating a personal
experience and what it meant to him. I also do
that. I also eat food and drink water, and
dispose of what is not used of them, the same as
all living people. I see nothing menacing or
threatening in what he reported. That's tacked on
by someone else, as a completely different comment on "apocalyptic Shiites."

Shi'a escatology might be worrisome, just as the
Christian version can be. But where am I
proposing something worrisome, if that's "orgasm
wikipedia's" intention to point out?

No, there is no particular reason to think that
Orgasm Wikipedia is anything other than a sock
puppet, or meat puppet, in the Wikipedia trope.

If he's a separate person, it just goes to show.

In particular, remarks reportedly made after his
speech before the United Nations General Assembly
have created concern (translated):
(www.ahmadinejad.ir)

    On the last day when I was speaking before the
    assembly, one of a country's group told me that
    when I started to say "In the name of God the
    almighty and merciful," he saw a light around
    me, and I was placed inside this aura. I felt
    it myself.

    I felt the atmosphere suddenly change, and for
    those 27 or 28 minutes, the leaders of the world
    did not blink. When I say they didn't bat an
    eyelid, I'm not exaggerating because I was
    looking at them. And they were rapt.
    It seemed as if a hand was holding them there
    and had opened their eyes to receive the message
    from the Islamic republic.

Former CIA officer Robert Baer said, in the context
of evaluating a nuclear strike on Iran, that
Ahmadinejad and others in the Iranian government
are "apocalyptic Shiites." He continues, "If youâ?Tre
sitting in Tel Aviv and you believe theyâ?Tve got
nukes and missiles - youâ?Tve got to take them out. These guys are nuts and there's no reason to back
off.

Notice where the threat is coming from. It's
explicit. "You've got to take them out." That is
"former CIA officer" Baer saying that it is
*necessary* to attack these evil Shiites before they kill us or our friends.

Lots of nuts in this world but Jojo, you are definately not one of them.

Orgasm Wikipedia

Brilliant. Scary. Remember, there are Christians
who believe that support for Israel, including
attacking and killing the enemies of Israel, is a
necessary part of the Apocalypse, and they propose to trigger it.

I knew someone else who was crazy like this:
Charles Manson. Believe it or not, in person, he
sounded much saner than Jojo Jaro and "Orgasm
Wikipedia," a name clearly created to comment
here, in these immediate discussions. Manson also
managed to convince a few friends that he was
right, and I knew a couple of them as well, and
they are still in prison. Very scary. Deadly scary. Tragically scary.

There is danger from the Iranians, for sure, but
God help us if these "Christian" loonies get
their hands on nukes. They are essentially
announcing that they will use them to kill the
"bad guys." Satan loves that one, it is his favorite trick.

What did Jesus say about this?


Reply via email to