In this case with silica - there is no apparent net gain of energy - the
reaction is one-way and conservative. 

 

One could do the same thing with aluminum nanopowder. It oxidizes releasing
lots of hydrogen - end of story.

 

In the case of Casimir and LENR, where the net reaction is gainful, there
will be a conversion of mass into energy. Defining the correct route for the
conversions of mass to energy is the theoretical hang-up.

 

It could be protons fusing to deuterium as Ed Storms suggests, or not. 

 

My favorite explanation is that proton mass is an average mass, not
quantized - and there is a natural route to extract some of it (few parts
per million)  in the form of magnons via the nickel catalyst. The magnon is
the quantized spin wave which couples to a goldstone boson in the proton
converting that bosonic mass to energy.

 

Actually - that particular route would be available to silicon
nano-particles if there was anomalous energy here, but no one is claiming
anything more than a more rapid reaction.

 

 

From: David Roberson 

 

It would be an excellent idea for me to have a better understanding of how
the Casimir effect performs this function, but I have a hang up called the
COE that must be overcome first.  I always seek a combination of mass or
other form of stored energy to become converted into the required energy.
In this case, it takes a finite and well defined number of joules per gram
to separate water into its constituents. 

 

Does this energy arise as a result of cooling of the remaining materials?
That would be an interesting development and  falls into place as an example
of the type of process that was recently discussed on vortex.  I recall
someone suggesting that the cooling of water by the evaporation of some of
the mass acted in a similar manner.  If the water is separated and at the
same time the temperature of the remaining water reduced I can imagine a lot
of useful applications provided that the process proceeds at more than a
snail's pace.

 

Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: Jones Beene <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Jan 22, 2013 6:21 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Hydrogen- via Nano Silicon and Water

It looks like nano-silicon may be getting help from Casimir geometry and
FRET.
To quote: "In a series of experiments, the scientists created spherical
silicon particles about 10 nanometers in diameter... and also created
hydrogen about 150 times faster than similar reactions using silicon
particles 100 nanometers wide." END of quote
Possible message for LENR researchers - micron or even 100 nm geometry is
not going to work very well and yet it is very costly to get smaller
geometry: but you must find a way. 10 microns is incredibly small, 100
nanometers is 100 times smaller - but not small enough ... and thus the
difficulty in replication of a robust effect.
The Forster Radius (FRET) is 2-12 nanometers, and is well known in biology
as a dimension where photons are far more active - and this it is exactly
the same dimension where the Casimir force operates, is not coincidental. 
Nor is it coincidental that  LENR (of the NiH variety) happens at this
geometry. NiH reactions may involve some kind of photon chain reaction,
especially UV photons
         From: Ron Kita 
         
         Greetings Vortex,
         
         Feynman was correct- there is plenty of room at the bottom:
         
         Splitting Water with Nano-Silicon:
  
http://phys.org/news/2013-01-scientists-silicon-hydrogen-demand.html
         
         Respectfully,
         Ron Kita, Chiralex
         Doylestown PA 18F

Reply via email to