On Feb 2, 2013, at 12:58 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:

> That would produce 155,789 GWH which is still considerably above the actual 
> total of 125,914. Using that crude method of assuming the average was 53,500 
> nameplate, the capacity would be 27%, not 33%.

I did more exact although still crude approximation using following formula:

(47GW+(13.1GW−8.4GW)×.7)×.285×24h×366 = 125 900 GWh

This formula considers that 8.4 GW was installed on Q4, therefore they are 
assumed to contribute less than 50 %. This means that capacity factor was near 
0.285 what is quite good. Typically onshore capacity factor is near 0.25 
whereas on offshore it might be above 0.4. 

—Jouni

Reply via email to