Below are some interesting insights from Keng Chi, a respected Switching power supply engineer/author/Consultant that I have the privilege to consider a friend. He has helped to shape some of my views on cavity suppression and has always been more open to the possible existence of natural/organic forms of LENR. Fran
From: kengchi goah [mailto:kengchi.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 1:06 PM To: Roarty, Francis X Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: Boeing Li-ion battery Frank: Nice to hear you. Of course, I do not mind you cc our exchange to Vortex-I. For a long time, I have been questioning Princeton Plasma Lab's magnetic confinement approach. They are utterly heading the wrong direction. No wonder after more than 50 years and billions spent, they cannot show something. Keng On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com<mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>> wrote: Keng, Would you mind if I cc this exchange to Vortex-l? I did put Jones on CC since this is all stuff he has been pursuing vigorously. Vortex-l has discussed the possibility of these fires being ignited by LENR and frequently revisits LENR as the source for molten rock magma. Jones Beene has even posited this as the primary heat source for the suns' corona. Jones also characterized Casimir confinement as occurring at the boundary where 3D becomes 2D -your further progression from a 2D seam to a 1D "tunnel" is intriguing... Your mechanism for energy transfer is also interesting but needs clarification..are you suggesting the Field creating the casimir confinement can transfer energy directly between the moving gas atoms in the cavity and the walls.. do you not need some asymmetrical event to prevent these energies from cancelling to zero? Some form of thermal or electrical rectification to derive energy? If ZPE is a precondition as I suspect then going from a 2D plane where "random" gas motion is limited to 360 degrees about one axis becomes just fwd and backward motion along a single axis... My posit is this type of confinement allows for self assembly of a Maxwellian or Heisenberg trap.. and if Naudts is right about this being relativistic hydrogen then the energy available sky rockets because "confinement" is a "warp" that suppresses virtual particles not a "well" or luminal velocity which compress these virtual particles like rain against the windshield of a speeding car [Haisch and Rhuda] . I am saying this isn't relativistic in the sense of an object approaching C or approaching an event horizon - this is a "negative" relativistic effect where the "temporal motion" of hydrogen is suppressed by Casimir geometry relative to our normal time line. From the perspective of the hydrino, time in the macro world slows down in the same manner we attribute to the Twin Paradox but without the limitation of the Pythagorean relationship between V^2 and C^2 . IMHO a reverse form of time dilation becomes possible based on the inverse cube of plate spacing [Casimir geometry] and is the underlying physics behind catalytic action. Fran From: kengchi goah [mailto:kengchi.g...@gmail.com<mailto:kengchi.g...@gmail.com>] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 4:36 PM To: francis roarty; Roarty, Francis X Subject: EXTERNAL: Boeing Li-ion battery Frank: I tend to believe that the "jelly roll" structure of the subject battery is conducive to monoatomic hydrogen energy shedding; exactly the effects we talked about. Recall at one point I was suggesting that magma, molten rock, heat source may be due to the same mechanism: atomic hydrogen seeps into crust fissure (2D seam or 1D funnel) and its electron shield (energy packet) undergoes redistribution to comply with the extremely confined boundary condition. Energy is released in the process. If Boeing, battery manufacturer, and NTSB investigators keep looking for answer in charger, battery monitor, or anything external, they may be wasting their time. Keng
