Recently I have been exploring issues associated with thermodynamics since it 
has been many years since I studied the subject.  I wanted to understand why 
certain rules apply and exactly what that suggests is happening at the basic 
levels.  This particular subject comes up often as we analyze LENR devices and 
so it is useful to pursue.


I was considering the Carnot cycle and other heat engines when it became 
apparent to me that this is nothing more than a statement that the COE 
(conservation of energy) applies to these devices and that there is nothing 
mysterious happening.  The fact that a heat source and sink is required for the 
engine to operate is easy to understand in the context of COE.


The way I approached the topic was to consider an ideal gas that exists in a 
given state.  The average kinetic energy of the gas atoms is directly 
proportional to the absolute temperature (K).  If you double the temperature 
then you double the kinetic energy of the particles.  If you halve the 
temperature, then you will find that the kinetic energy is reduced to one half 
of the original value.


So, if I take a given volume of this ideal gas at any given temperature and 
extract mechanical energy from it then only a portion of the original energy 
remains.  For this thought experiment I do not allow any other paths for energy 
to escape.  In a simple example lets extract 1/2 of the kinetic energy from the 
experimental gas source.  This would not be a bad engine if it could convert 
one half of the available energy into mechanical energy.  The exhaust gas would 
thus have exactly 1/2 of the original energy it had before it was put to work 
so its temperature must be 1/2 the original value.


The Carnot efficiency is defined as 1-Tc/Th.  In the example that I reviewed 
the efficiency is 1-.5 or .5 which is 50%.  This makes a great deal of sense 
since my machine extracted exactly one half of the energy that it could have 
taken if it operated on a perfect cycle exhausting 0 degree gas.  Someone with 
a different engine than mine would obtain better results if the exhaust gas is 
ejected at lower temperatures and hence less kinetic energy.  It is important 
to notice that no energy is lost in this operation.  The remaining energy is 
resident in the form of kinetic energy of the ideal gas molecules and might be 
extracted at some later time by another process.


I hope that this post is useful to others and will help to burrow through the 
complexity of thermodynamics in a way that makes the behavior understandable to 
everyone.  It will be interesting to consider the emission of radiant energy 
using similar thought processes.  Answers for some of the difficult questions 
that have been recently discussed might materialize as a consequence.


Dave

Reply via email to