I'm listening to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPccMlgug8A
He is interesting and he has good points but he makes too much of them. The problem is when you do real science you realize that his points are not practical or useful. For example the constant changing with time. Look what happened with the speed of the neutrinos few months ago. In the end it was found to be a problem with one of the wires of the devices used. Chasing each anomalies one can think about is pretty wasteful use of resources and time. Also it seems that his criticism of conventional science comes from the bias he has towards his silly theory. Science is wrong for him because he wants his "spiritualist" theories are in contrast with it Giovanni On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Terry Blanton <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Giovanni Santostasi > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sheldrake makes a lot of absurd claims that are unsubstantiated. > > And he doesn't understand how creation from nothing is the most natural > > thing of all. > > I rather found him entertaining. His ideas are the type which are > usually welcomed on this forum. > > I told you he could be annoying. > >
