The lowering of the coulomb barrier might be the result of a distructive Fano resonance caused by the quantum mechanical interaction of the lattice phonon and the electron near a discontinuity in the metal lattice. My study of the Fano resonance is current ongoing. Thoughts?
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > There’s more…**** > > ** ** > > Speaking of RF frequencies and surface resonance triggering – and since > Ni-H reactions can be significantly different from Pd-D (and since we have > not heard from Frank Z on this topic yet) … here is a bit more information. > This is a chart which shows a rather precise linear - and tight - > temperature-to-frequency correlation for Ni, near the Nickel Curie Point. > Many results going back to Arata, including Ahern and others - find Ni-H > triggering near the Curie Temp – 358 C.**** > > ** ** > > > http://www.overunity.com/10039/ground-breaking-work-of-frank-znidarsic-cold-fusion-anti-gravity-explained/dlattach/attach/102481/image//<http://www.overunity.com/10039/ground-breaking-work-of-frank-znidarsic-cold-fusion-anti-gravity-explained/dlattach/attach/102481/image/> > **** > > ** ** > > I do not know where he got this information – so maybe he will share that > with us. This would not apply to Pd-D.**** > > ** ** > > If accurate, this might indicate that focusing on the host material is as > important as spin-flipping of proton and also the wisdom of getting hold of > VHF transmission equipment capable of very precise frequency stimulation.* > *** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* DJ Cravens **** > > ** ** > > Several areas seem to be of interest: > > check out http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Hagelsteinprogresson.pdf > Letts and I found resonances at around 8, 15 and 20 THz related to the > phonon > stimulation of the Pd D lattice. These are near surface. > > and RF around 83 and 365 MHz > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BockrisJtriggering.pdf > These relate to the the flipping of the deuteron, protons and neutrons in > the > B field of the orbiting electrons. These are likely surface effects due > to the skin effect. > > I personally like to do a typical NMR frequency (6.5 MHz/ tesla) on the > deuterium > with an applied B field. B fields seem to help. > > But most of these only work for "triggering" the effect. It seems to > continue after > the initial stimulation. (that is why it is hard to just scan > frequencies- we need an off > to compare to). > > Oh yes, in the early days a few commented on radiation used for triggering. > I typically add Th to my metal formations which may help (via its alpha > emission not > to mention its "thirst" for deuterium) > > Dennis Cravens**** > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:12:19 -0800 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Vo]:First post about LENR > > Much discussion in the LENR world focuses on cracks resonances etc....**** > > ** ** > > Has anyone in this field done a systematic search for resonances on the > surface of bulk materials,**** > > ** ** > > ie stimulate H or D loaded samples with radiation from DC to Xray > searching for a resonant point?**** > > ** ** > > A lot of the variation in LENR could be attributed to a very high Q > structure that only occasionally gets randomly stimulated.**** > > ** ** > > Once stimulated the reactions themselves keep it "ringing" and they even > occasionally run away...**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Paul**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** >
