Artificial intelligence will be in control of us if we are not smart enough to 
place limits upon it.  If the human brain can be effectively duplicated with 
electronics it will become impossible to tell the difference between an android 
with one and a normal person without difficulty.  Will it be fair to consider a 
creature of this type as expendable when it has real feelings and emotions?   
Is it right to make these androids our slaves to do all the dirty work?  I can 
imagine some tough questions for future folks to answer.


Why would anyone want to build a nuclear weapon in the future when all of the 
peoples needs are being met?  There should be no resources in short supply to 
fight over.



Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, Feb 25, 2013 6:34 pm
Subject: [Vo]:The limits of 3-D replicators


I wrote:
 



It seems unlikely to me that anyone will be able to fabricate a cold fusion 
device at home, using 3-D printers or what-have-you. Not for the next thousand 
years or so, until those machines evolve into Clarke's universal replicators.




Maybe 1,000 years is too much, but it will be a long while.


There has been a lot of enthusiastic talk about these 3-D printer replicator 
things. I am all for them! I think they are great. But I think some naive 
commentators fail to recognize some crucial limitations to today's versions:


1. They use only material. Plastic. They cannot be used to fabricate metal, 
wood, silicon or nickel. You cannot make a NiCad battery or a cold fusion 
device with that.


2. Resolution is limited. You could not make a computer chip, even if the 
devices could lay down silicon and metal. I do not think resolution is fine 
enough for a cold fusion device. Certainly not nanoparticle devices.


Despite these limitations, I expect these things will become useful for making 
parts in the lab such as the fitting that holds the cathode and anode in place.


In the distant future, the capabilities of these machines may gradually expand, 
until they can lay down any element in any configuration. Such as, for example: 
a fried egg, the Hope Diamond, a copy of the Mona Lisa correct down to the 
molecule, or a thermonuclear bomb. That is what Clarke predicted. By the time 
that happens we can hope that the machines will have so much built-in 
intelligence, it will refuse to fabricate a thermonuclear bomb. The process 
will be so complicated that no human will be able to override the build-in 
protections, or run the machine manually.


- Jed



 

Reply via email to