In reply to [email protected]'s message of Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:14:51 -0500 (EST): Thanks Lou. :) [snip] >Robin, > >198Hg is used as the frame of reference >- isotopic measurements in this paper are ratios w.r.t. 198Hg. > >-- Lou Pagnucco > >mixent wrote: >> In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:25:35 -0800: >> Hi, >> [snip] >>>There is a graph (in the abstract) which seems to indicate that one >>> isotope >>>is the main source of the anomaly, and two others participate. >>> >>>http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es303940p?source=cen >> >> What happened to 198Hg? >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >> >> >> > Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
