Should be interesting, I think the place is crawling with dark matter and
we have just been misinterpreting what we are seeing. I think it is the
thermodynamic piece of entropic gravity that was missed. It is messy
though, just look at the severe weather upsets, it is not just warming, it
is warming followed by extreme condensing/cooling that creates the
severe storms. I think dark matter/energy is the great cosmic condenser,
mostly micro black holes of entropy containing varying levels of vacuum
energy.
Stewart
Darkmattersalot.com
On Monday, March 4, 2013, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
> That was a good article!
>
> What bothers me most is that physicists often argues against MOND, because
> it is not comprehensive enough and must thus be discarded. I think that
> this is wrong approach, because what if physics is inherently dirty? That
> there are no elegant and universal theories? MOND explains well rotational
> curves of galaxies and is now shown that it is also predictive theory.
>
> But what if MOND fails in explaining the origins of Galaxies and we need
> different theories to explain those events? After all these events happened
> yet again at different cosmic scale that requires different theories.
>
> I have put my money on that there will be no dark matter that explains the
> anomalous rotational curves of galaxies.
>
> —Jouni
>
>
> On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:01 PM, Terry Blanton
> <hohlr...@gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'hohlr...@gmail.com');>>
> wrote:
>
> We don't need no steenkin' dark matter:
>
>
> http://science.time.com/2013/02/26/cosmic-fuggedaboudit-dark-matter-may-not-exist-at-all/
>
>
