Jones ,
 I am ok with negating the "sealed  heat engine"  but since we aren't talking 
about combustion but rather what you referred to once as a cold engine I remain 
open to a possible "sealed cold engine" based on  changes in isotropy where 
reversible  chemical reactions runaway when compression reduces bounding gas 
pocket  geometries around ionized gas like hydrogen down into the active 
Casimir region such that disassociation is discounted below the amount of 
energy returned when the gas immediately re-associates.  My hypothesis is based 
on Jan Naudts paper regarding the hydrino  as actually being relativistic 
hydrogen and a 1996 paper " Cavity QED by Zofia Bialynicka-Birula. The two 
papers taken together suggest that Casimir supression results in what Puthoff 
would describe as a reduced "vacuum pressure" in the same way that an observer 
in a deep gravity well or approaching C would perceive  us on earth as being in 
a reduced "vacuum pressure"and greatly accelerated/catalyzed. The only 
difference is we tend to consider Casimir supression as negative from our 
perspective because we insist on considering our macro perspective of space 
time as being the zero reference point when there is no 3D motion...apparently 
we have to start thinking about 4D displacement when we delve into lattices and 
especially vacuum suppression geometries and the defects that make these 
suppression values dynamic. Puthoffs vacuum pressure can be considered the 
standard pressure that defines the stable elements in the periodic table and as 
such helped us derive COE and is the source of HUP as virtual pairs enter and 
exit our plane displacing real particles equally and randomly along all 3 
axii... Your mention of Casimir geometry as approaching the limit of 2D may be 
one clue to how ZPE becomes unbalanced / biased against one of the axis we 
experience in our "frame" in the same way the Paradox Twins exist on phase 
shifted 3 of 4D's relative to each others frame. This also explains the time 
dilations reported and gives a better working mans concept for catalytic action 
instead of the current metrics description based on surface areas. This is all 
to reiterate my suspicion of a self assembling HUP trap that reduces the 
disassociation threshold of H2 or D2 that is common between all the 
players..Mills, Papp, Mahg, Rossi..even the menisci of bubble fusion to explain 
the observed plasma...although the dynamics are probably the biggest discount 
to the disassociation threshold the fact that vacuum pressure is lower in the 
cavity and doesn't require energy to propell the gas near C suggests 
contributions through time dilation as well where the reversible reactions are 
actually occurring much slower from the local perspective of the gas atoms 
themselves. Are we possibly trading time for energy by spatially unbalancing 
HUP from our reference frame?
Regards
Fran

_____________________________________________
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 10:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:CANR explains the original Papp engine


In the history of the Josef Papp saga, Gene Mallove took a special interest in 
a few details that are not well-known.

There was a video of a US Navy military sponsored explosion, a "cannon" 
reported by Gene to have used Papp's technology. I haven't seen the video, but 
it is available from IE. What would be more interesting than a poor video (but 
we can only guess what is reported) is the actual Navy report of this test. 
Maybe someone should put in a FOI request for it.

http://www.infinite-energy.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=85

Historically, it looks like there could have been a number of explosions of 
radium compounds that were more intense than chemical reactions but much of 
that info is not online since it goes back in time over 100 years.

http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=457526

http://libserv23.princeton.edu/princetonperiodicals/cgi-bin/princetonperiodicals?a=d&d=Princetonian19360418-01.2.4&e=-------en-20--1--txt-IN-----

In addition to a short half life, radium is extremely chemically reactive. This 
could be a clue in what is going on in a radium-powered engine, as the patent 
describes. In CANR the idea has been around for a long time that chemical 
reactions can cause(catalyze) nuclear reactions, or speed up nuclear decay by 
many orders of magnitude.

The first reliable  instance of this phenomena is found in the deuterium 
chloride "trigger" for the first device developed at Los Alamos in the 1940s. 
This was the "Kistiakowsky trigger" named after Dr. K - the Head of the 
Explosives Division of the Manhattan Project. The chlorine must 
"photo-activated" to cause deuterium to release neutrons, possibly by 
"stripping."

Can radium chloride be "triggered" like DCl when the photo-activation is arc 
discharge or sparks?  Who knows, but if so - Radium is three million times as 
radioactive as the same mass of uranium. Plus its decay product - radon is far 
more radioactive than radium. If there is such a beast as "accelerated" decay 
due to CANR, then this could explain most of the Papp mystery - including the 
desert Cannon explosion.

There are reasons to suspect that Papp was able to get a radium powered engine 
to work, and that after the Feynman affair, he never could use radium again. 
Many would like to believe that a Papp engine operated without radium after the 
Feynman affair - but I see zero proof of that. There were tests which were 
seen, but like Feynman said - it is not too hard to put batteries into an 
oversized crankcase.

There is a lingering suspicion that after the fatality -  CalTech could have 
been using the radioactivity, discovered from the explosion - in legal 
maneuvers against Papp,  in order to force the plaintiffs into a settlement. 
There are probably a few people still around LA that could stir up that ball of 
snakes.

Jones




Reply via email to