In reply to  Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:18:50 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> More widespread use of electric cars could make a difference here. They
>> could
>> have a built in voltage sensor that allowed them to automatically charge
>> when
>> the grid voltage rose above a certain level . . .
>
>
>They may not need that. I have heard that internet connected power supplies
>can be turned on and off remotely to accomplish this. They are already in
>use in some places, to remotely reduce loads such as large air conditioners
>during peak hours.

Yes, I know, but my way is better. It's completely automatic. It's comparable to
a free market compared to centralized control in a communist system.
Besides who wants a centralized authority turning off the power that is charging
their car? A bit too much room for abuse IMO.

Most cars spend 90% or more of their time parked, so they have lots of
opportunity to act as a reserve storage system.

>
>Georgia Power installed a smart meter at our house that charges different
>amounts at different times of day. It transmits data by radio. See:
>
>http://www.georgiapower.com/residential/products-programs/smart-meter/

Yes, possibly soon coming to my neighborhood too. I wrote to IBM telling them
how to do away with the radio transmitters, which some people object to, but I
suspect my email ended up in the "round archive".

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Reply via email to