If it is physically impossible then it has to be ignored not attacked. It came as an alternative to many other theories that gave not much to the CF/LENR experiments- perhaps as a desperate solution.It is not easy to demonstrate that impossibillty. But it is really impossible, how could it had success at some NASA specialists who cannot be called naive or ignorant,or worse. We better try to explain its PR success than insist on attacking it. Peter
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > I do not follow these theory debates. But it is my impression that people > consider the W-L theory extremely far-fetched and physically impossible. > They do not oppose it out of personal animosity. > > I find it a little annoying that the W-L proponents manage to put > themselves front and center in the mass media news accounts of cold fusion. > I don't know or care whether the theory is valid, but if it turns out to be > invalid, then trumpeting it in the mass media will hurt the reputation of > cold fusion. I suppose you could say the same thing for reports about Rossi. > > I also find it annoying when Krivit manages to put himself into the focus > of the news. He gets himself quoted as if he were some kind of expert. He > is good at that. It does not really matter, but it is mildly annoying. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
