In reply to  Harry Veeder's message of Sat, 23 Mar 2013 04:04:55 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>> The weak force doesn't actually present a barrier. It presents a chance that
>> something will occur. Electrons and protons don't normally combine into 
>> neutrons
>> because their combined mass is inadequate. It's 782 keV short of the mass of 
>> a
>> free neutron.
>
>>However, they could combine to form a reduced mass neutron as part
>> of the nucleus of a heavier atom. This does in fact happen with some 
>> isotopes.
>> It's called "electron capture" (EC). In this case, even though the mass of 
>> the
>> proton is also reduced, the net result (an isotope of the previous element in
>> the periodic table), is sufficiently more stable than the initial isotope to
>> more than make up for the difference.
>> Regards,
>>
>> Robin van Spaandonk
>>
>> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>>
>
>ok, so they don't normally combine because the rules of QM forbid it
>or at least say it is highly improbable below some energy/temperature
>level.

It's actually classically forbidden. 1 baseball + a second baseball does not
make 3 baseballs.

>So QM provides the "barrier", but I presume it becomes more likely if
>you substantially increase the kinetic energy of the two particles.
>The necessary kinetic energy  is converted into the extra mass
>required to form the neutron and this is, roughly speaking, what the
>W-L theory proposes.

Only very roughly. They don't actually explain where the extra energy comes
from. Note that *extra* is about 1 1/2 times the mass of an electron.

>
>However, it would be interesting to speculate if the kind of low
>energy electron capture you describe could happen more frequently.
>In other words, If reduced mass neutrons could be made easily (from a
>free electron and free proton/deuteron)  would this one "miracle" be
>able to explain observations without the additional miracles required
>by the W-L theory.

Note that they can only be made *in* another nucleus, or at the very least,
very, very close to it, such that the ensuing neutron(s) are immediately
captured.
This is included in Horace's theory, see
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/DeflationFusion.pdf and also a possibility
with Hydrino fusion.
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Reply via email to