… these papers would relate to gamma ray “thermalization” how, Axil?

 

Remember:

1)    A Josephson junction (JJ) is an effect of superconductor and of 
nano-layering to form the junction

2)    The highest temperature superconductor operates at minus ~150 C.

3)    A Josephson junction requires lower temperature than the superconductor

4)    If  the JJ should somehow manage to thermalize a gamma, which is 
technically impossible in classical physics due to conservation of momentum, it 
would still lose its superconductivity due to the many billion degree heat of 
the gamma

5)    If the junction only works once, what value is it?

6)    If by some convergence of six or seven miracles, the LENR experimenter 
stumbles on a design in which a)   LENR cold fusion occurs, 

b)    Gamma radiation is released proportional to the excess energy but at a 
low proportion say 10% 

c)    The metal matrix acts as an extremely high temperature superconductor – 
350 C. 

d)    In addition, the superconductor is perfectly layered as a JJ, without 
gaps in coverage

e)    All gamma radiation (99.999%) is absorbed in the layers, so long as it 
remains superconductive

f)     And 10 watts of excess power is being produced by the cell 

g)    The experimenter still dies within the first minute of operation, since 
the enormous heat of a gamma ray is deposited in a nanometer layer, melting any 
metals or ceramics instantly - and destroying the JJ effect.

 

I cannot see any remote possibility that this suggestion – that an array of 
Josephson junctions is capable of thermalizing gammas, relates to reality – or 
to anything more than a dilettante’s exercise in futility. 

 

Thermalization of gammas does not happen in LENR simply because it is 
unnecessary - there are almost no gamma rays in LENR to thermalize. Sure, there 
is a paper out there where a few hundred gammas are seen over several days of 
high excess heat operation – a few dozen per hour, but that is essentially NO 
GAMMAs. 

 

Here is a useful round number to use for this kind of LENR cell: 1000 MeV / sec 
= 1.6 x 10^-10 watts. 

 

If the gamma is 1 MeV and 10 watts of excess thermal power is coming from the 
cell and 10% of the energy is seen in gammas, then you should see 
10,000,000,000 gammas per second, and not a few hundred per day. It is 
unimaginable that this kind of gamma output is easily thermalized.

 

Once again, Axil –  repeat after me: there are NO GAMMAs in LENR to thermalize

 

 

related 


1.      <http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.5459> Nonequilibrium Josephson oscillations 
in Bose-Einstein ...


2.       

3.      arxiv.org ›  <http://arxiv.org/list/cond-mat/recent> cond-mat 
<http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:0h9Xk0UudFEJ:arxiv.org/abs/0903.5459+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us>
 Cached <javascript:void(0)> Share

Shared on Google+.  <javascript:void(0)> View the post.

4.      You +1'd this publicly.  <https://www.google.com/> Undo

5.      by MT Martinez - 2009
Mar 31, 2009 – Nonequilibrium Josephson oscillations in Bose-Einstein 
condensates without dissipation. Mauricio Trujillo Martinez, Anna 
Posazhennikova, ...


6.      <http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.105302> Nonequilibrium 
Josephson Oscillations in Bose-Einstein...


link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.105302 <javascript:void(0)> Share

Shared on Google+.  <javascript:void(0)> View the post.

You +1'd this publicly.  <https://www.google.com/> Undo

by M Trujillo-Martinez - 2009 -  
<http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&cites=6587423569196030866&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=X&ei=ah9hUZ3TAYTmiwKUi4CQDA&sqi=2&ved=0CEUQzgIwAQ>
 Cited by 18 -  
<http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=related:khv3otU6a1sJ:scholar.google.com/&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=X&ei=ah9hUZ3TAYTmiwKUi4CQDA&sqi=2&ved=0CEYQzwIwAQ>
 Related articles
Sep 4, 2009 – Nonequilibrium Josephson Oscillations in Bose-Einstein 
Condensates without Dissipation. Mauricio Trujillo-Martinez,1 Anna 
Posazhennikova ...

1.      *  


2.      <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19792326> Nonequilibrium Josephson 
oscillations in Bose-Einstein ...


3.       

4.      www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19792326 <javascript:void(0)> Share

Shared on Google+.  <javascript:void(0)> View the post.

5.      You +1'd this publicly.  <https://www.google.com/> Undo

1.      by M Trujillo-Martinez - 2009 -  
<http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&cites=6587423569196030866&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=X&ei=ah9hUZ3TAYTmiwKUi4CQDA&sqi=2&ved=0CE8QzgIwAg>
 Cited by 18 -  
<http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=related:khv3otU6a1sJ:scholar.google.com/&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=X&ei=ah9hUZ3TAYTmiwKUi4CQDA&sqi=2&ved=0CFAQzwIwAg>
 Related articles
Sep 4, 2009 – Nonequilibrium Josephson oscillations in Bose-Einstein 
condensates without dissipation. Trujillo-Martinez M, Posazhennikova A, Kroha J.

 

On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

 

 Coherent Oscillations in an Exciton-Polariton Josephson Junction 

arxiv.org/pdf/1004.2216

 

Reply via email to