This should serve as a caution flag to experimenters.  The effect that lead to 
the explosion needs to be determined and may serve as an additional clue about 
the process involved.  It is not surprising that he saw a PTC which I believe 
is normally assumed at the higher typical temperatures of operation.


Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: a.ashfield <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, Apr 12, 2013 12:53 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Danger of explosions with LENR


              Subject: Danger of EXPLOSION: possible        cathalitic effects 
even at low temperatures.
        From: Francesco Celani Date: Fri, April 12, 2013 11:13 am To:        
[snip] @ gmail.com [snip] @ yahoo.fr, [snip ] @ ni.com,        [omitted] @ 
chavaenergy.com, [omitted] @ missouri.edu, [omitted]        @ nasa.gov    
  Dear          Colleagues, 
    
  In            These days I am performing very simple experiments at low       
     temperatures, down to 77K. 
    
   I            am using two wires, one with 2 Layers (called            
"nanodiamandois") and the other usual with 500 Layers, Both            of 
Constantan type ISOTAN 44. 
    
  *            Under vacuum and / or He (2.5bar), I detected a PTC            
(Positive Temperature Coefficient) with the 2L Constantan            (about 
4%). 500          With Layers The NTC detected (about 3.5%). 
    
  *            When I added H2 (2.5bar) During cooling down, at a            
temperature of about -50 ° C, 
    
   The          EXPERIENCEDEXPLOSIO N. 
    
  *            The bottle, nominally tested at 16 bar at 50 ° C, was            
completly destroyed. No. iniury to us, thanks to the open plastic tube          
used as dewar.  Just          big noise. 
    
  *            There is a Possibility That Such material is cathalitic even     
       at low temperatures, as reported by Also in old paper of            
Hydrogen absorption at low temperatures using Constant tick            film. 
    
  !!            PLEASE, SHARE SUCH INFORMATION TO ALL THE PEOPLE INVOLVED in    
        the replication efforts. 
          Dear            [omitted], put in the MFMP Such new blog, ASAP!    
    
  Tanks            for your collaboration. 
          Francesco            CELANI 
    
     Shortly          after one of the recipients of the email responded in 
this          way: 
    
  Francis, Thank          you for the warning - most interesting. 
        
               Also I can add a warning - we have had a runaway          event 
with Cuprothal 49 - from a constantan alloy Kanthal (9          meters of 0.7, 
wire prepared in our own experiments) at a very          modest temperature: 
<180C.  Fortunately the event was contained in a titanium          tube reactor 
Although it melted the tube Which gave at least          as the ability to 
estimate the temperature and power output at          800-1000C for 30-60min 
resulting in an estimated power output          of around .5-1kWh.  This 
incident occurred During cool down after the          completion of several 
weeks testing and with all electrical          inputs disconnected ...  I know 
it appears that a runaway event is possible          with zero input under 
conditions That are difficult to predict          / reproduce. 
        
               Cheers 
      
  
 

Reply via email to