*It seems a little premature to talk about the behavior of the Higgs particle at this point.* You are correct, it is very premature, but a basis for speculation does exist,INHO.
There is some indication that the Higgs is a electroweak force moderator because it does produce a boson that decays into the Intermediate Vector Bosons Z, W+ and W- bosons. The charged W bosons participate in the transformation of quarks in which the flavor of the quark is changed. In this way, these W electroweak particles can convert one type of nucleon into another and they both cause alpha decay. One reason they can do this is their short range and that range is made possible by their large mass. The Higgs field gives these W particles this large mass. LENR may well be an outgrowth of the Higgs field. Now wouldn’t that be something? Cheers: Axil On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 8:06 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil, > > It seems a little premature to talk about the behavior of the Higgs > particle at this point. I am not aware of any tests that have been > conducted to support the assumed characteristics. The new particle may > just be a high mass beginning to an endless array of ever increasing masses > as the energy of the accelerators is expanded. So far that is what has > been observed. > > Do you know of recent proof that the discovered "Higgs" actually has > anything to do with other particle mass? > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Sun, Apr 21, 2013 5:30 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:NASA screws up bad. > > The recent verification of the Higgs mechanism shows a connection > between the electroweak force and spontaneous production of the W-bosons, > W+ and W- involving spontaneous symmetry breaking. > When sufficient electromagnetic charge carrying gage photons are > concentrated near the nucleus of the atom, The coupling constant between > the charge carrying photons and the Higgs field will increase sufficiently > to produce W+ or W- electroweak bosons that will change a neutron into a > proton through color change in one channel or produce alpha decay through > another channel. > I am working on this idea so it is still raw. But your opinion is always > valuable. > See: > > http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=10&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CG4QFjAJ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lhep.unibe.ch%2Fimg%2Flectureslides%2F70_2010-5-25_Particle-Physics-8.pdf&ei=X1F0UevNDsmS0QGOsYG4DQ&usg=AFQjCNH41HEKT-aA42cw_npg2ocsasTUSA&sig2=1_jRdjEcFg6mAOrk0bZyRw > > I need some time to learn the Higgs mechanism in more detail. > > Cheers: Axil > > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 5:00 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 21 Apr 2013 00:41:16 -0400: >> Hi Axil, >> [snip] >> > >> http://crystalchannelers.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/new-science-the-widom-larsen-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-lenr-theory/ >> > >> >W&L has gone with Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) electrons. This is a >> >mistake,they cannot do this because of the lack of energy density in the >> >SPP, IMHO. >> > >> >The W&L theory must be totally revamped is they want to use SPPs as they >> >should. >> > >> >Cheers: Axil >> >> I'm a little confused here. If you don't think WL is applicable, then >> what >> mechanism involving SPPs do you envisage is responsible for CF? >> >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >> >> >
