This is a follow up post to the thread RE: Proton radius in question, after 3 years the textbooks may need to be corrected...
A new paper addresses the charge radius of muonic hydrogen http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDYQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F1304.2076&ei=Dst6UdvRNeuA0AGguIDwCQ&usg=AFQjCNHjSh-Dd82H939V24dWhjlLyvMp3w&sig2=p48n4S7E2TCXH2BiO3fewA&bvm=bv.45645796,d.dmQ Bound-state field theory approach to proton structure effects in muonic hydrogen It looks to me like the reason for the change in the charge radius of the proton for muonic hydrogen is charge concentration increase. It looks like the proton should be looked at as a distribution of charges inside a quantum well. Because the muon orbits closer into the hydrogen nucleus, the increase in the QED charge of the muon moves the distribution of quarks inside the proton. The phyOrg article says as follows: Being so much closer, its energy levels are more sensitive to the radius of the proton (specifically, how the proton's charge is distributed over its volume). Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2013-02-textbook-radius-proton-wrong.html#jCp Increase in the EMF field that the proton lives in will change the radius of the orbitals of the electrons around the proton; bring them closer in toward the proton because of quark charge distribution. Could it be the reason for the observation of hydrino spectral evidence quoted by Milles as electrons move closer in toward the nucleus when charge concentration is increased and enlarged around the proton?
