In reply to Joseph S. Barrera III's message of Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:42:21 -0700: Hi, [snip] >On 4/29/2013 8:54 AM, Chris Zell wrote: > > > A bit of both. The headline seems to promise the reader a >breakthrough that doesn't appear - > >I can agree with that. > > > and is this technological effort a bit redundant? > >We don't know yet. As long as we don't, I think exploring multiple >options is prudent. > >- Joe I think it would be more prudent to trim 10% off the budget, and distribute it over hundreds of other potential solutions (i.e. "long shots"), many of which could be tested for just thousands of dollars, rather than billions.
Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
