I think that in case experiments cannot be done, reality (facts) cannot be known, theory cannot be verified or modified, the virtuous cycle is interrupted and the scientific method fails. Let's focus on LENR Peter
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]> wrote: > I think what people are saying: The concept of science works but the > application frequently sucks! The Scientific method is a guide, like the > Ten Commandments, but is likewise frequently ignored. Nevertheless, the > idea works and provides an incentive for people who need a guide. > > Ed Storms > > > > On May 2, 2013, at 12:01 PM, Peter Gluck wrote: > > Yes, eventually it works, but what works actually is the Science of > tomorrow > not the Science with which we start > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]>wrote: > >> after reading Thomas Kuhn, Nassim Nicholas taleb, Wade&Broad, Roland >> Benabou, and after some experience in the backcourt of democracy and >> Science, you know that it is a myth... >> >> anyway, with hurts and delays it finally works... with some bloody >> revolution regularly. >> >> >> 2013/5/2 Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >> >>> it seems we have to re-define some basic concepts >>> The author (who, if I remember well, has supported the idea of Cold >>> Fusion, >>> writes here about our dear Scientific Method: >>> >>> There is no Scientific Method: >>> >>> http://bigthink.com/in-their-own-words/there-is-no-scientific-method >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>> Cluj, Romania >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
