On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Joseph S. Barrera III >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> On 5/3/2013 11:07 PM, Harry Veeder wrote: >>> >>> > What I am saying is that neutrons and protons conform to the quark >>> models (u,u,d) and (u,u,d) when they are probed at high energies. At lower >>> energies they are different. >>> >>> What is your model for them at low energies? >>> >>> - Joe >>> >>> >> Consider a non-Newtonian fluid. >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYSlK4f94p0 >> >> The resistance of the liquid increases with the velocity impact. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-Newtonian_fluid >> >> I wrote about this couple of years on vortex, but back then I made the >> mistake of trying to apply it to the EM forces between charged particles. >> I should have applied it to the nuclear force. >> >> >> >> Harry >> >> >> > more examples > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UU7iuJ98fRQ > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yp1wUodQgqQ > > Now imagine a non-Newtonian drop floating on the spacestation subject to > external impacts and vibrations and you can see how > quarks can arise within a nucleus in a high energy environment. > > Harry > > A more "scientific" presentation of a non-Newtonian fluid: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCHPo3EA7oE Harry
