It is about minorities % of physicists who believe in LENR; % of LENR- ists who believe in LENR+ (but wait a year!)
I think the most relevant, relative recent case is that of Helicobacter pylori The case is well described, statistics cannot be made. All the cases are half history , three quarter anecdote. My poisoning hypothesis is analogous to it, but I will not receive the Nobel Prize. Peter On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]>wrote: > Just a practical question . (serious, I need a number) > is there any statistic about the ratio of physicist who think LENR is not > real? > > is there a recent number about the number or peer-reviewed papers, > positive or negative about LENR, eliminating the journal that are dedicated > to LENr, free energies, and uncommon science (as mainstream says)... > > does some people also know that kind of numbers for other past great > discovery, at inception, like : > - planes > - hygiena > - continental drift/wegener > - QM > - fission > - heliocentrism > - immunization > - 5-symmetric crystal > > I'm afraid there are few of those data, and that the few data on recent > stories have been erased (like 5-symmetries)... > > it seems that today it is a problem to address, so at least I should have > answers. > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
