PopSci isn't impressed : <http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-05/cold-fusion-machine-gets-third-party-verification-inventor-says>
.. The paper, which is not peer-reviewed, leaves out crucial details, for example referring to "unknown additives" instead of specifying what chemicals actually go into the reaction. ... Maybe because it's a black-box///////// red-hot-box test ? ... Even among those who work on cold fusion—often tinkerers not associated with major research institutions—Rossi doesn't necessarily inspire confidence. ... Uh-oh .... they're onto us!
