Daniel,
I'm misunderstanding this reference of yours to the control with the empty
reactor. If there's a gizmo, then I assume it's either in the power supply or
the waveform generator. I suspect you're making a serious point that I'm
missing here.
Andrew
----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel Rocha
To: John Milstone
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem
But that would mean another device, a circuit, which modified the input when
they compared with the empty reactor.
2013/5/21 Andrew <andrew...@att.net>
I don't know if you are an EE in any way (I am), but irrelevant it is not.
If the measurement probes only work up to 60 Hz and the majority of the power
is being pumped at 200 Hz (arbitrary numbers), and the probes are 40 dB down at
200 Hz....
Andrew
----- Original Message -----
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem
Andrew <andrew...@att.net> wrote:
Rossi has stated that the input waveform is proprietary. Therefore the
obvious question is whether these researchers were even allowed to look at it.
I do not think they were allowed to look at it, but it is irrelevant.
They measured the power going into the power supplies and wave form generator.
Output power far exceeded all input power into the entire system. It does not
matter what the power supplies did.
- Jed
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
