Daniel Rocha wrote: They tested a dummy device, that is, an empty reactor, which showed a supposedly correct IR emission. The input was the same.
and this is important here. I'm not done thinking about this. Let's say that there's a covert HF power feed, for example. For Daniel's statement to make sense simultaneously in this case, somebody would need to creep about and flip a secret switch. That's too rich a conspiracy for my blood. Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: David Roberson To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:32 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem The meter appears to have important limitations. We need to see data showing the actual input waveform in real time in order to be confident that the measurements are accurate. I assume that the scientists performed this test during their evaluation. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, May 21, 2013 11:22 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem > From: "Mark Jurich" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:15:19 PM > > FYI (To anyone): > > Here's a link to Info on the PCE Instruments PCE-830-1 Power Analyzer > http://www.pce-instruments.com/english/measuring-instruments/installation-tester/power-analyzer-pce-holding-gmbh-power-analyzer-pce-830-1-det_60706.htm Oh-oh .... no mention of DC at all. That Bryce fellow is going to have a field day!
