Duncan - Take a look at that power meter. There's a bunch of stuff that could 
get by it. As we've seen with a certain Fullerton prof., being a decent 
physicist doesn't mean you grok electrical engineering.

Another advantage of those cooling coils you're suggesting is that some 
elementary calorimetry can be done. One can never have enough measurements.

Andrew
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Duncan Cumming 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:58 PM
  Subject: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem:cooling coils




  Hi, guys!

  This is my first post, Andrew invited me in to the list. I read the Levi et 
al paper, and I noticed that they measured an input power of around 400 watts 
and an output power of around 2000 watts. But (for control simplicity reasons) 
they had no insulation on their tube furnace, and had to keep input power 
connected so as to keep the reaction going. 

  Why not use an ordinary, properly insulated electric tube furnace fitted with 
cooling coils on the inside? That way, the input power could be disconnected 
entirely once the reactor starts to run, and the temperature controlled by the 
coolant flow. A run of 96 hours producing 2000 watts with no input power would 
be a lot more convincing to many people. The reason is that, even if the power 
measurement is inaccurate, the fact that the machine is self sustaining means 
that some power must be being produced. Probably compressed air in stainless 
steel coils would be a suitable coolant for this application.

  I think that a self sustaining reactor running for a few days at a few kW 
would go a long way towards improving the credibility of this particular 
device. There is no need to generate electricity, just thermal output without 
electrical input, only using electrical energy to start the reactor.

  Duncan Cumming


  -------- Original Message -------- Subject:  Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a 
gem : power conditioner needed 
        Resent-Date:  Wed, 22 May 2013 13:32:49 -0700 (PDT) 
        Resent-From:  [email protected] 
        Date:  Wed, 22 May 2013 13:33:57 -0700 
        From:  Andrew <[email protected]> 
        Reply-To:  [email protected] 
        To:  <[email protected]> 



  I doubt that Rossi would allow a power conditioner, because he himself states 
that there is some 

   <snip>
  Andrew



Reply via email to