blanco69

May 20th, 2013 at 5:17
PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=806&cpage=5#comment-700859>

Congratulations Snr Rossi! I read the report today with joy in my heart.
Can I ask you Sir, What were your hopes when you agreed to allow the tests?
And who do you see as the audience of the report?

Andrea Rossi
May 21st, 2013 at 2:38
AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=806&cpage=5#comment-701215>

Dear Blanco 69:


I was sure that whatever the result, it surely had to be honest and really
independent: none of the Professors are competitors, none made patents in
competition with ours, all are totally independent from us under the
economical point of view as well as economically independent from any
competitor of us; they have no connections with our competitors, as we
could certify. Their work has been hard, very conservative, professional
and totally independent from us as well as our competitors and from big
corporations or Government Entities that want to compete with us and made
patents trying to copy us. This is why we trusted them to the point that we
gave them our device leaving them totally free in a room deserted by us, at
their complete disposal, where they did what they wanted without any
limitation put by us. The sole limitation we put has been the impossibility
to open the reactor and look at the internal structure of the E-Cat.


About the audience: I am receiving many beautiful comments, to each of
which I want to answer with my personal thanks. Thank you!


Warm Regards,
A.R.

Reply via email to