My sense is that the over-arching sentiment among those of us who look at all
this with "a jaundiced eye" is that an Addendum to the report be produced by
the original team. This ought to contain a lot more detail, such as is being
discussed here. It would certainly serve to dispel a lot of idle speculation.
Hartman got the ball rolling, but there is much more that is as yet unmentioned.
If anyone here has personal contacts leading to Hartman et al, now would be a
good time to prevail upon the gentlemen's good graces.
Andrew
----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Goldwater
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:possible error in power-in calculation in Levi et al paper
The picture of the power monitor that started this discussion is not part of
the official report, and might have been made during a setup or adjustment. It
is interesting in that it gives us some otherwise unavailable clues as to the
measurement setup, and in that context it has been a useful starting place for
analysis.
I now believe it is showing a single voltage probe connected and the others
just lying on the bench. The problem then is that the watch shows a time stamp
that may be during the test period. If someone could find documented start and
end times for the December test, that question can be answered.
On 5/26/2013 2:25 PM, Irb wrote:
I thought 230V was Neutral to Phase,
Root 3 x 230 approx 400V is phase to phase voltage, <snip>
