Sounds like an excellent idea Bob. A hitch might develop if the testers bring the LPF along with them and attempt to power down the ECAT to insert it.
It does seem ludicrous for anyone to suggest that Rossi would not allow the scientists to view the waveform at the power socket. If this happened, please let us hear from the testers for confirmation. Anyone with an ounce of integrity would immediately quit the test and file a negative report had they attempted to make this measurement and been turned away. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Rob Dingemans <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, May 27, 2013 10:05 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:The inanity of the hidden input power hypothesis Hi, On 26-5-2013 5:55, Duncan Cumming wrote: > Now for the argument that Rossi runs the risk that somebody will try a > type B meter (DC capable), or, for that matter, a simple oscilloscope. > He simply does not permit such things. He claims not to allow an > oscilloscope because it would reveal a "proprietary waveform". By > keeping tight control over the test conditions, he is able to ensure > that his questionable power measurements are not exposed. By not > allowing inspection of the heater controller, he keeps the diode (or > asymmetrical firing of the Triacs) from public view. Rossi behaves as > if a mundane heater control is super-secret technology - does nobody > else find this strange? I can hardly believe that when you connect a scope to the same wall plug as to which the input for the E-cat is connected that Andrea will not allow this. If my assumption is right that: a: the proprietary waveform is of a much higher frequency/waveform then the AC from the wall plug, b: Andrea might be afraid for feedback signals coming from the E-cat control box back into the grid, then a low-pass filter (up to ~ 50 Hz) between the wall plug and the E-cat control box should be sufficient for: a: the scope not being able to detect the proprietary waveform generated in the control box and fed back to the grid, b: at the same time still be able to detect any possible "strange" waveforms trying to being inserted through the wall plug into the control box of the E-cat, c: and also preventing any "strange" waveforms to be passing through the low-pass filter into the control box of the E-cat :-) . B.t.w. if Andrea is afraid of the proprietary waveform generated in the control box and fed back to the grid from happening he should redesign his control box and include the low-pass filter as a part of the internal circuitry. Kind regards, Rob
