I would put the Rossi reaction tube in the middle of a lithium heat pipe.
This pipe conducts heat great. Its thermal conductivity is billions of
times as efficient as water. This would equate to a large and highly
reactive thermal mass.

You should try to model this type of design.


On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:26 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:

> I have no idea how nano-particles might be associated with the Rossi
> device.  I do however think that any final product that he produces must
> have a panic button of some sort when the process gets out of control.
> Perhaps your idea might constitute a safety process.
>
> Dave
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Mon, May 27, 2013 1:41 am
> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Constant temperature Operation of ECAT?
>
>  Assuming that the Rossi reaction is based on nano-particles, say of
> hydrogen and potassium, it may be possible to disrupt these
> clusters electrically. This will reduce the vigor of the reaction. But in a
> short time the hydrogen and potassium nano-clusters will build again,
> requiring that they be continually disrupted in a cycle.
>
> As long as the cluster disruption circuit is working, the reactor will not
> overheat. I the circuit fails, another mechanism to stop the reactor must
> be used such a blowing off the hydrogen.
> The cluster disruption circuit would allow the reactor to walk the knifeā€™s
> edge of stability at a very high temperature.
>
> I wanted to get your expert opinion on this idea.
>
>
>

Reply via email to