Alan Fletcher reported a correction by Levi et al. They did measure DC after all. This might be lost in another thread, so I thought I would copy it here to a new thread.
May 28, 2013 at 2:26 AM > < > http://cassandralegacy.blogspot.com/2013/05/ethics-of-e-cat.html?showComment=1369733204626#c7691737630487135094 > > > > > Earlier statement : > > Prof. Essén wrote this paragraph as a comment to this piece of interview > that appeared on http://www.pureenergyblog.com/?p=1232 : > > -------------------------------- > Interviewer: Have you tried to test the output of the power supply to > exclude that also a DC current is supplied to the device, which clamp > amperometers could not detect? > > Prof. Essén: No, we did not think of that. The power came from a normal > wall socket and there did not seem to be any reason to suspect that it was > manipulated in some special way. Now that the point is raised we can check > this in future tests. > -------------------------------------------- > > > > [ cleaned up on another blog : ] > > “In the interview I answered that there was no direct measurement of dc > (since the clamps could not detect such). This was a bit hasty. In future I > will not answer such technical questions without conferring with all > coauthors. After analysing what we checked and measured (which were many > more variables that those from the clamps) we can definitely exclude > dc-current. (This is what comes from being nice to journalists.)” > > Alan's comments: > I suspect that there may be a revised version of the paper with an > analysis of this. > > So we are left with : > > a) The input AND output measurements are valid > b) It's all a fraud by Rossi, Levi .... > > The latter, of course, is outside of science, and in the field of > conspiracy theorists. > >
