I won't bet a cent on papp engine, but unlike magnetic motors, if papp engine is working is is visibly a nuclear energy source, like LENR in hydride...
question on papp, like LENR, is not whether it is allowed to exist, but whether it works. I'm fed up with people mixing nonconventional nuclear energy sources, and over-unity TD1 /TD2 law-breakers... by the way, I'm also fed up with theories in patents. not the place. patent should stay patent. If there is no known corpus of data about a technology, then the patent have to be very precise, or be void... if there is known phenomenological model or theoretical model, description may be more implicit as expert in the domain will quickly fill the holes in the description. an nobody should deduce something is real from a patent. and patent office should check only that fact, take more care to protect from patent troll than for overunity devices. 2013/5/29 Andrew <andrew...@att.net> > ** > "*Papp's engine was an over-unity device*" - really? > Have you ever seen his utility bill? > > Andrew > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2013 1:11 PM > *Subject:* [Vo]:Why scam??? > > The US patent office has placed a ban on patents covering over unity > devices, perpetual motion machines, and inventions based on pseudoscience. > LENR inventions have been ban. > > > > Rossi may be doing these tests to provide proof that his device works to > support his patent application. > > > > > > Jo Papp was awarded two patents for the Papp engine when he supplied proof > that his engine worked to the US Patent office even though his invention > was an over-unity device. > > > > Rossi does not understand how his invention works yet. The LENR engineering > problems will be overcome well beyond the time that the scientific > operating principles are sufficiently understood in detail. > > > > > Rossi has sold his IP to a US company. He has not scam incentive to keep > the fraud going, so why do a six month test in the near future? > > > > Rossi needs proof of function to get a patent. The decision to demonstrate > function must have been made by the new IP owner in order to get US patent > protection. Rossi cannot make business decisions now. > >
