From: Joshua Cude
First, the fact that this *source* of energy thousands of times more dense than chemical has to be plugged in (to a high power line, no less) will turn most observers away. Not necessarily “most” - only those observers whose ability to deduce and extrapolate from experience is severely challenged. For instance, an atomic bomb is initiated by a chemical explosion, and it is thousands of time more energy dense. A hydrogen bomb is initiated by and atomic bomb explosion, and it is a thousand times more energy dense. Most observers do not have much difficulty extrapolating from that kind of known phenomenon - into another kind of mass-to-energy conversion, requiring a substantial trigger. In any event - “thousands of times” more dense is not accurate IMO – closer to 200 times. If you understand “recalescence” and then can extrapolate to a reaction which is recycled around the phase change, then the rationale of adding energy to gain energy is more understandable. This is a phenomenon of phase change seen every day in a steel mill. Wiki sez: Recalescence is an increase in temperature that occurs while cooling metal when a change in structure with an increase in entropy occurs. Of course, in this circumstance, it is a one-time thing and there is no violation of Conservation of Energy in normal recalescence. Next, to complete the explanation - we will need to demonstrate how mass is converted into energy in a order one-time recalescence event to look like a succession of events. That can been done, but there is little purpose in trying to explain this to anyone with afflicted with tunnel vision. Jones
